Skip to content
IntegratorBuilder

Planned

Mass and stability (F2S)

Canonical source: the F2S deliverable of the OpenAMRobot 2.0 execution plan, owned by the platform lead and published with the mechanical release in openamr-platform-hw. This page explains the model and the status of its results; the workbook with the formulas is filed with the deliverable.

Applies to: OpenAMRobot 2.0 with upper-body mounting option B (P-03 revision 18.9 item 18, 9 October 2026): lift column on a two-position base plate, shoulder 1000 to 1350 mm. For guidance on extending mass and stability in your own build, see Mass and stability in the customization section.

Fabrication gate, not a certificate

F2S is the gate that must pass before any structural part is fabricated. It is a static and quasi-static model on flat floors. It does not replace the physical tipping and braking tests of the commissioning window, and it makes no safety certification claim.

What the model answers

Question Method
How heavy is the robot and where is its centre of gravity? Mass budget of every subsystem with its position, from CAD volumes, supplier data and the official OpenArm 2.0 description
Can it tip while working? Centre of gravity projected onto the tipping boundary (castor swivel axes minus the 15 mm castor offset) in four poses: travel, both arms forward with payload, one arm sideways, and a 150 N drawer pull at 1090 mm
Can it tip while braking or turning? Forward and lateral acceleration at which the centre of gravity crosses the boundary, compared with the configured deceleration and the traction limit
How far does it travel before stopping? Reaction latency plus braking at the configured deceleration, up to the speed limit
Is the drive pair within its rating? Gross mass against the ZLTECH 120 kg drivable-mass rating, plus the vertical load per motor in a rocking case with a dynamic factor

Results

Rerun pending for option B

The model of 28 September 2026 was built for an upper body without a lift and is no longer current. Its results are withdrawn from this page. The model is being rerun for option B; results will be published here when the rerun is complete.

The rerun covers:

Case Option B values
Lift position Fully extended, shoulder 1350 mm at the OpenArm arm mount point; retracted, shoulder 1000 mm
Base-plate position Both column positions, centre (bp000) and +50 mm (bp050)
Upper-body geometry Lift column 530 to 880 mm on the 304 mm base-plate top face, column axis 330 mm behind the chassis front edge (x = +0.060 m from base_link at bp000, +0.110 m at bp050, P-03 revision 19.0), arm mount point 180 mm ahead of the column axis, head camera 22 mm ahead of and 223 mm above the arm mount point
Height envelope Complete robot at most 1700 mm at full lift extension
Poses and loads Travel, both arms forward with payload, one arm sideways, 150 N drawer pull at 1090 mm, braking and turning

Inputs and their status

Input Source Status
Platform geometry, castor and wheel positions, base-plate mounting face Platform STEP model From CAD
Lift column, base plate and arm profile geometry and masses Supplier CAD and data for the DOLD Hexalift V4, option B layout Supplier CAD pending
Chassis mass CAD volumes at steel density, top cover included To be weighed
Arm and gripper masses Official OpenArm 2.0 description and CAD Official
Battery mass and position Selected pack and the 25 percent placement decision Decided, pack not yet built
Castor offset and height Supplier data, Blickle LPA-VSTH 35K Official
Wheel friction coefficient Supplier data, ZLTECH Official
Radial load limit per motor ZLTECH Requested
Dynamic factor for uneven floors Assumed 1.5 Replaced by the physical rocking test

Operating envelope

These limits come from the earlier model and are confirmed or replaced by the option B rerun.

  • Flat indoor floors. Thresholds and cable covers are crossed at crawl speed until the physical test replaces the assumed dynamic factor; the 35 mm castor wheels stop on small steps.
  • Drawer and door pulls up to 150 N at working height with the hands kept close to the body.
  • Command ceiling 1.5 m/s in software, treated as an analytical limit until the stopping tests set the accepted operating speed; obstacle detection must reach at least 0.9 m ahead at that speed.

Next

Hardware architecture shows the electrical side of the same robot; General arrangement shows the geometry the model uses.